Mother of Tears
I had both Thursday and Friday (07/03 and 07/04) off so I ended up getting a bit of a holiday weekend.
Thursday I did mostly mundane stuff—laundry, grocery shopping, seeing my therapist—but in the evening my brother-in-law took me to see Dario Argento’s Mother of Tears. It was playing at my favorite theater, the Music Box, which is one of the few old style, non-multi-plex movie houses left in
Mother of Tears is the third installment in Argento’s Three Mothers Trilogy that began with the 1977 classic Suspiria (one of my favorite horror films) and continued Inferno (which I haven’t seen) in 1980. These movies deal with three sister witches—the Mother of Tears, The Mother of Sighs and the Mother of Darkness—who have houses in
I’ve always preferred the chilling, atmospheric giallo of Argento’s early days to his latter work which is more baroque and vividly horrific. Still, Mother of Tears was a pretty enjoyable as a gory horror movie with strikingly bizarre imagery and minimal story. Many creative things were done with intestines, and some gorgeous Roman architecture was shown as packs of witches resembling Madonna circa 1983 descended on the ancient city.
There was actually a strangely retro vibe to the whole film, as if it had come a few years after the previous chapters of the trilogy rather than nearly three decades later. All the witches wore new-wave make-up and the scariest witch, a Japanese girl with a silver front tooth reminded me of nothing so much as a particularly menacing Tama Janowitz.
The heroine of the film was played by Dario Argento’s daughter
My brother-in-law Dean had brought a bottle of citron vodka along and we had spiked cokes but I didn’t drink enough of mine to even get buzzed as vodka sort of turns my stomach. Even with the citrus flavoring it still tastes thick and chemical and sort of vile to me. I consider this repulsion a good sign. My ex-boyfriend, who was a recovering alcoholic, always said that one of the things that separated alcohol abusers from casual drinkers was that the abuser would drink anything available to the point of intoxication whereas the casual drinker tended to have personal preferences and wouldn’t drink if they couldn’t have something they enjoyed.
I’ve been drinking again for a little over a month and it really is an experiment to see if I can drink socially and casually. So far I feel like I’m doing all right. I did go out of bounds at the party a couple weeks ago where I embarrassed my sister but I didn’t totally lose it. In the past I’ve often figured that once I go past a point I might as well relinquish all control and finish off the bottle. I didn’t do that this time and I think it’s because I’m trying to look at drinking differently, not as a huge cathartic experience I allow myself a couple times a year but as something I can incorporate into my life and do in moderation maybe once a week or so.
As I said, it’s an experiment. If it doesn’t work I’ll probably go back to not drinking at all because I know how dangerous problem drinking can be.

